The Association of BRAF Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (rs113488022) with Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Craniopharyngioma
Abstract
Background: Craniopharyngiomas are benign but locally aggressive sellar tumors with high postoperative morbidity. The BRAF V600E mutation is a hallmark of the papillary subtype, yet its prognostic significance remains controversial. Most studies have focused on papillary craniopharyngiomas, while the potential role of BRAF gene variations in clinical outcomes across both subtypes has been underexplored. This study investigated the association of BRAF single nucleotide polymorphism with clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes in patients with craniopharyngioma.
Methods: The current historical cohort study included 47 patients with histopathologically confirmed craniopharyngioma who underwent endoscopic endonasal resection. BRAF rs113488022 genotyping (TT, TC, CC) was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens using real-time PCR. Associations between genotypes and histopathological subtype, tumor volume, calcification, lobulation, extent of resection, postoperative complications, recurrence, and mortality were analyzed.
Results: The patients included 26 males (55.3%) and 21 females (44.7%), with a mean age of 25.06 ± 17.17 years. The most frequent BRAF rs113488022 genotype was 'TC' (76.6%), followed by 'CC' (14.9%) and 'TT' (8.6%). A significant difference in genotype distribution was observed between adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas (P=0.024), with the 'CC' genotype being more common in the papillary subtype. No significant associations were found between BRAF rs113488022 genotypes and tumor volume (P=0.93), calcification (P=0.61), lobulation (P=0.34), extent of resection (P=0.47), recurrence (P=0.55), mortality (P=0.13), or postoperative complications including diabetes insipidus, visual changes, and BMI changes (all P>0.05).
Conclusion: While BRAF rs113488022 genotype distribution differs significantly between histopathological subtypes and serves as a valuable diagnostic marker, it does not independently predict postoperative surgical outcomes, recurrence, or mortality in craniopharyngioma patients. Larger prospective studies are needed to further elucidate the prognostic significance of specific BRAF SNPs.
2. Müller H, Merchant T, Warmuth-Metz M, Martinez-Barbera J, Pugest S. Craniopharyngioma Nat Rev Dis Primer 5 (1): 75. 2019.
3. Brastianos PK, Taylor-Weiner A, Manley PE, Jones RT, Dias-Santagata D, Thorner AR, et al. Exome sequencing identifies BRAF mutations in papillary craniopharyngiomas. Nature genetics. 2014;46(2):161-5.
4. Larkin SJ, Ansorge O. Pathology and pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas. Pituitary. 2013;16(1):9-17.
5. Reyes M, Kelly P, Kang K, Williams J, Sathe A, Kayne A, et al. Effect of Extent of Resection and Adjuvant Radiation on Recurrence of BRAF versus β-Catenin–Mutated Craniopharyngioma: A Single Institutional Case Series. Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base. 2025;86(05):570-6.
6. Xu C, Ge S, Cheng J, Gao H, Zhang F, Han A. Pathological and prognostic characterization of craniopharyngioma based on the expression of TrkA, β-catenin, cell cycle markers, and BRAF V600E mutation. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13:859381.
7. Brastianos PK, Twohy E, Geyer S, Gerstner ER, Kaufmann TJ, Tabrizi S, et al. BRAF–MEK inhibition in newly diagnosed papillary craniopharyngiomas. New England Journal of Medicine. 2023;389(2):118-26.
8. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro Oncol. 2021;23(8):1231-51.
9. Losa M, Mazza E, Pedone E, Nocera G, Liscia N, Reni M, et al. Targeted therapy in BRAF mutated aggressive papillary craniopharyngioma: a case report and overview of the literature. Journal of Endocrinological Investigation. 2024;47(11):2835-42.
10. Luo N, Lin Y, Feng J, Cai L, Zhang Y, Wang X, et al. Comparative analysis of clinical features, methylation and immune microenvironment in pediatric and adult papillary craniopharyngiomas: results from a multicenter study. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):27422.
11. Fujio S, Ilmansyah R, Makino R, Juratli TA, Sugata J, Bakhtiar Y, et al. Prospects of BRAF/MEK Inhibitor Therapy in Papillary Craniopharyngiomas with the BRAF V600E Mutation: A Scoping Review. Neurologia medico-chirurgica. 2025;65(5):217-29.
12. Fujio S, Juratli TA, Arita K, Hirano H, Nagano Y, Takajo T, et al. A Clinical Rule for Preoperative Prediction of BRAF Mutation Status in Craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery. 2019;85(2):204-10.
13. Taguchi A, Kinoshita Y, Kojima M, Amatya VJ, Tominaga A, Takeshima Y, et al. Optic tract edema in craniopharyngioma as a predictor of BRAFV600E mutation presence. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2023.
14. Yue Q, Yu Y, Shi Z, Wang Y, Zhu W, Du Z, et al. Prediction of BRAF mutation status of craniopharyngioma using magnetic resonance imaging features. J Neurosurg. 2018;129(1):27-34.
15. Goschzik T, Gessi M, Dreschmann V, Gebhardt U, Wang L, Yamaguchi S, et al. Genomic Alterations of Adamantinomatous and Papillary Craniopharyngioma. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76(2):126-34.
16. Marucci G, de Biase D, Zoli M, Faustini-Fustini M, Bacci A, Pasquini E, et al. Targeted BRAF and CTNNB1 next-generation sequencing allows proper classification of nonadenomatous lesions of the sellar region in samples with limiting amounts of lesional cells. Pituitary. 2015;18(6):905-11.
17. Iranmehr A, Esmaeilnia M, Afshari K, Sadrehosseini SM, Tabari A, Jouibari MF, et al. Surgical Outcomes of Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery in 29 Patients with Craniopharyngioma. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021;82(4):401-9.
| Issue | Vol 9, No 2 (2026); In press | |
| Section | Original Article | |
| Keywords | ||
| BRAF V600E Craniopharyngioma Polymorphism Prognosis Recurrence Surgical Outcomes | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |

